Similar to the working alliance, the perceived quality of the real relationship was related to using more methods to prepare the patients to the transition (r = .18, p < .05) and perceived positive patient experience (r = .24, p < .01). Age, years of clinical experience, number of patients seen weekly before the pandemic, previous video therapy experience, and views of video therapy before the pandemic were not associated with the perceived quality of alliance or the real relationship in online sessions.
Elite worry about-question and you will anxiety
On average, therapists experienced professional self-doubt sometimes or frequently (M = 2.41, SD = .67, range: 1.11–4.78) in video therapy during the pandemic, which is higher than the level of self-doubt experienced by therapists in a prior naturalistic study of PSD (Nissen-Lie et al., 2013 ; t(136) = , p < .0001), but still on the lower end of the 5-point Likert scale. Therapists felt less competent (M = 2.28, SD = .52, range: 1.00–3.00) and less confident (M = 2.15, SD = .56, range: 1.00–3.00) about their professional skills during online compared to in-person sessions. Higher levels of reported professional self-doubt were related to several demographic variables, such as younger age (r = ?.34, p < .001), less clinical experience (r = ?.33, p < .001), and worse perceived patient experience (r = ?.36, p < .001).
Therapists’ anxiety about using video therapy was moderate (M = 2.87, S.D. = .86, range: 1.00–4.83). Similar to professional self-doubt, higher anxiety was associated with female gender (t(137) = 3.24, p < .05), younger age (r = ?.30, p < .001), less clinical experience (r = ?.36, p < .001), smaller number of patients before the pandemic (r = ?.18, p < .05), no previous experience with video therapy (t(138) = 3.63, p < .001), not being licensed yet (t(136) = 3.28, p < .001), perceiving patients as having a negative video therapy experience (r = .27, p < .001).
Overall in our sample, therapists reported somewhat positive attitudes towards video therapy (M = 3.42, SD = 0.50, range: 2.31–4.69). Although their views about video therapy had become more positive since the start of the pandemic (t(140) = 2.06, p < .05); they still thought that video therapy was somewhat less effective compared to in-person therapy (M = 2.19, SD = 0.65, range: 1.00–4.00).
Therapists who held more positive attitudes towards video therapy tended to have previous experience with video therapy (t(142) = 3.53, p < .05) and to have positive perceptions of their patients' online experience (r = .30, p < .001). Higher rated working alliance and real relationship were associated with more positive attitudes towards video therapy (r = ?.34, p < .001 and r = ?.40, p < .001, respectively) whereas professional self-doubt was associated with more negative attitudes (r = ?.34, p < .001).
The sample of therapists as a whole was undecided as to whether they would like to continue using video therapy in the future (i.e. expressed a neutral response on the UTUAT Behavior Intention subscale), with large differences among therapists (M = 3.14, SD = 1.23, range: 1.00–5.00). Therapists who intended to use video therapy in the future were more likely to have prior experience with video therapy (t(138) = 2.91, p < .01), and tended to have positive perceptions of their patients' online experience (r = .32, p < .001).
Find Table step 1 to own an introduction to the fresh new correlations involving the standard actions. The newest relational, professional and tech-associated balances was in fact correlated regarding the asked assistance. Especially, ratings into genuine relationships and dealing alliance had been seriously correlated, and you can professional thinking-question and you may stress was in fact absolutely regarding each other but negatively for the claimed operating alliance and you may actual relationships, exhibiting you to practitioners that have low levels of professional care about-doubt and you will anxiety reported a healthier operating alliance and you may real dating employing on the internet patients into the pandemic. New perceptions to the and you may intent to use movies procedures on upcoming was certainly of reviews of doing work alliance, and you datingranking.net/ios-hookup-apps can real matchmaking, and you may adversely regarding elite group notice-question and you can anxiety (pick Dining table 1).
In today’s mix-sectional questionnaire studies, i aimed to explore therapists’ experiences out of movies procedures after switching regarding inside the-individual video instruction during the pandemic. A whole lot more specifically, i checked: 1) Counselor perceptions of healing matchmaking (performing alliance and real matchmaking) into the films instructions than the prior from inside the-individual cures; 2) Therapist depend on during the elite ability (elite worry about-doubt) and you may knowledgeable nervousness about delivering clips cures; 3) Counselor thinking on movies procedures technology typically, plus intends to keep using clips medication about upcoming.
To the introduce sample, the inner surface estimate try Cronbach’s ? = .86. To assess this new knowledgeable change in the actual dating given that change to video treatment, next items was extra: “As compared to within the-person lessons, inside my online instructions the new therapeutic dating experienced … ” as answered towards a good three-section Likert size (step 1 = even more real than in-people, dos = an identical, 3 = less authentic than in-person).
Results
Women reported higher working alliance in online sessions compared to men (t(137) = 2.18, p < .05), licensed practitioners reported higher alliance score than trainees (t(136) = 2.33, p < .05), and practitioners in North America (USA and Canada) compared to those in Europe (t(137) = 2.08, p < .05). Within the sample, higher online alliance was also reported by those who used a greater variety of methods (as opposed to fewer methods) to prepare patients for the transition (r = .26, p < .01), and those who perceived their patients' experience with video therapy more positively (as opposed to less positively) (r = .32, p < .001).